View Single Post
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 3rd September 2007, 06:31 PM
Eolas Pellor's Avatar
Eolas Pellor Eolas Pellor is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: May 2007
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 916
Coins: 7,408.72
Bank: 0.05
Total Coins: 7,408.77
Donate
Karma:461
Eolas Pellor is a glorious beacon of lightEolas Pellor is a glorious beacon of lightEolas Pellor is a glorious beacon of lightEolas Pellor is a glorious beacon of lightEolas Pellor is a glorious beacon of light

Actually

Quote:
Originally Posted by evangelicalhumanist


If the subject were Christianity, and I had written that I had been a Christian once, but eventually came to the conclusion that, "It's such a "sewer" of an ideology; and that reflects its essential sophomoric character," would there be no Christian who would take that as an offensive remark against something which they feel defines them?

Irrelevant. A totally specious argument since I am not a Christian (as you should know by now), and am not speaking for a Christian, all Christians or any Christian. I am speaking only for myeslef. As you are well aware.


And, actually, I have read such remarks by atheists about Christianity. And you have too, they're not uncommon. It''s funny how things become "offensive" when they're on the other foot, isn't it?

Quote:
If that's truly the case, then I am sorry I took offense. At the same time, however, I think that we should henceforward all feel perfectly free to make whatever such remarks, couched in the same declarative language, about any belief system we'd like.

And I am sorry that you find someone's account, of their own spiritual reaction to something they once espoused, offensive.

Quote:
The subject was atheism.

No, it wasn't!! The subject , as I understand it, is Atheism a ncessary stage in spiritual development.

Quote:
That, the way I read it, is a definitive statement, lacking any conditionals or verbs in the subjunctive mood. As I am an atheist who posts on this site, a fact of which you are aware, it would also seem to apply to me.

And why should I have to be more conditional about a matter of my own, personal, history, other than to say it is about me...which I did?

And, in that regard, let me point out the following:

Quote:
I think....I went....I gave it up...I realized...not necessary for me...I think that.... it certainly does to me....I am beset...

In four short paragraphs, that should be enough for anyone who can read to see that the statements relate to the person speaking, are his opinion. I do not think anything else needs to be said.

You are, purely and simply, off base.
__________________
Grassaf, Eolas

Last edited by Eolas Pellor : 3rd September 2007 at 07:01 PM.
Reply With Quote