![]() |
|
Welcome to the InterfaithForums forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support. |
|
|||||||
| Enlightenment Lessons in enlightenment - Run by Eddie |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Oh there are quite a few women that say that, Bernadette Roberts comes readily to mind, although she does say she isnt enlightened as a human form. There are a couple around in the advaita scene that write too, that I am aware off, although personally i think they have just subsituted one form of identification with another. But thats true for men as well. Genuine enlightenment is extremely rare, so its hardly like there are thousands of enlightened people on the planet. More like maybe 10 or so who are make it known, that they are open to teaching something that cannot be taught.
Historically though, women really werent in positions to write about enlightenment becuase of various discrimation practices that, some of which still exist today in some subtle ways or not so subtle ways. So we dont hear much about women historically. For example, if they had a experience where there was enlightenment there and no one to experience it, and then wanted to write about it, then society would heavily have been in favour of seeing that book never being published. Then there is just some maternal stuff that gets in the way is and while that is true for men too in that a lot of men are paternal, I tend to think that woman have more maternal instincts. Which you could also argue is a societal pressure. It is extremely difficult to negate your own children at a conceptual level, I am sure if I had children that my energy would be more invested in them than seeking enlightenment at the time, so in a way, my life worked out perfectly in that sense. But if I had children I doubt I really would have awoken to find I didnt exist So I think for the foreseeble future and for various reasons, there is still going to see a slight ratio that favours men more than women. But it wouldnt prevent either man of woman from the attempt at enlightenment, so both can have a crack at it, if they are that way inclined. I doubt that was quite the case historically...
__________________
Eddie Traversa Spiritual Enlightenment Blog http://www.truthrealization.com/index.php Last edited by Eddie : 7th August 2005 at 04:12 PM. |
|
|||
|
Hi Eddie & all. Again, excuse my newness to this forum if I misunderstand the best way to interact in this subforum. My particular take on "enlightenment" is from long study of Buddhism. Historically Buddhists were actually quite chauvinistic with many early schools of Buddhism prohibiting women from becoming monks (monkesses?) & in fact during much of the history of Buddhism the monks would encourage women to practice dharma diligently so as to be reborn a man in their future life & thereby have a better shot @ enlightenment. Now, of course, no buddhist school at least publically believes that. Was watching a national TV newsprogram thsi am with the wife, (the Today Show), in which they purported, though, to report on research that claimed there were natural physiological brain differences that explained why husbands apparently never seem to hear what their wives are saying
May be that factors in somehow thanks for your posted info, Earl |
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
InterfaithForums.com-Where your ideas and beliefs count.
|
|
|||
|
Why is it that women can remember an anniversary but cant remember that ball game?
__________________
Eddie Traversa Spiritual Enlightenment Blog http://www.truthrealization.com/index.php |
|
||||
|
That brings a sad reply, because many women aren't that interested. So if you are going to parallel the two, that would mean the men might not be that interested their wives. But, don't kid yourselves there are some very avid female baseball fans.
__________________
InterfaithForums.com-Where your ideas and beliefs count.
|
|
|||
|
Well when wives go into a 2 hour drama about what to wear tonight, then its not unfeasable to think that a lot of men would lose interest in that. Same for sports, when men go into a drama about that sport or car etc.. then its not unfeasable to think that women would loose interest in that. And so it goes...
__________________
Eddie Traversa Spiritual Enlightenment Blog http://www.truthrealization.com/index.php |
|
||||
|
There were quite a few "enlightened" women in india in the earlier vedic period, many of whom contributed to the upanishads (ancient india's spiritual discussion forum, now non-interactive, available in archive form only) ...
but during the later part of the vedic period, as the human society as a whole became more male oriented, we find less and less women in the spiritual world.
__________________
"Just multiply it with zero" ~ Some unknown buddha |
|
|||
|
I'm the only one...
Four Zen students took a vow of silence. Shortly thereafter, one of them broki it by saying soomething.
The second student took him to task, saying "You're not supposed to talk!" The third student said, "Why did you say somethng to him about it?" The fourth one said, "I am the only one who hasn't spoken." Maybe if you claim to be enlightened, you aren't? So that all these men who claim to be "enlightened" aren't, and the women, remaining silent on the subject, are?
__________________
Self-reverence, self-knowledge, self-control; these three alone lead one to sovereign power. Tennyson |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|