InterfaithForums

Welcome to the InterfaithForums forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support.

Arcade Support Us FAQ Calendar vBRadio Quiz
Go Back   InterfaithForums > Debate Forum > General Debate
Home Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

General Debate Debate any subject.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 31st December 2007, 01:28 AM
Rev. Kelly's Avatar
Modulator
 

Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 2,205
Coins: 31,698.12
Bank: 4,834,782.80
Total Coins: 4,866,480.93
Donate
Karma:401
Rev. Kelly is just really niceRev. Kelly is just really niceRev. Kelly is just really niceRev. Kelly is just really niceRev. Kelly is just really nice
Send a message via Yahoo to Rev. Kelly

Women at home

I know that some hold the belief that women should be at home taking care of hearth and home, but what would really happen to the world, the economy, and the family if women really stayed home?
__________________
"Philosophy is a walk on a slippery rock
Religion is a smile on a dog."
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 31st December 2007, 02:30 AM
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 3,028
Coins: 14,943,885.09
Bank: 0.00
Total Coins: 14,943,885.09
Donate
Karma:296
vivamis123 is a jewel in the roughvivamis123 is a jewel in the roughvivamis123 is a jewel in the rough



Are you talking about Women altogether or Mothers?
__________________
May your awareness be perfection
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 31st December 2007, 03:31 PM
Rev. Kelly's Avatar
Modulator
 

Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 2,205
Coins: 31,698.12
Bank: 4,834,782.80
Total Coins: 4,866,480.93
Donate
Karma:401
Rev. Kelly is just really niceRev. Kelly is just really niceRev. Kelly is just really niceRev. Kelly is just really niceRev. Kelly is just really nice
Send a message via Yahoo to Rev. Kelly

Quote:
Originally Posted by vivamis123
Are you talking about Women altogether or Mothers?
Women, they can be mothers but don't have to be.
__________________
"Philosophy is a walk on a slippery rock
Religion is a smile on a dog."
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 31st December 2007, 04:21 PM
Lightkeeper's Avatar
Admin
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Seattle
Posts: 9,197
Coins: 1,790,887.93
Bank: 8,892,659.55
Total Coins: 10,683,547.47
Donate
Karma:1793
Lightkeeper has a brilliant futureLightkeeper has a brilliant futureLightkeeper has a brilliant futureLightkeeper has a brilliant futureLightkeeper has a brilliant futureLightkeeper has a brilliant futureLightkeeper has a brilliant futureLightkeeper has a brilliant futureLightkeeper has a brilliant futureLightkeeper has a brilliant futureLightkeeper has a brilliant future



It seems to me children would be a lot better off if they were with their parents and not babysitters. Some how we should figure out ways that a child is 98% of the time with parents. Do we pay more attention to having things than we do to nurturing our children?
__________________
InterfaithForums.com-Where your ideas and beliefs count.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 31st December 2007, 04:40 PM
Rev. Kelly's Avatar
Modulator
 

Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 2,205
Coins: 31,698.12
Bank: 4,834,782.80
Total Coins: 4,866,480.93
Donate
Karma:401
Rev. Kelly is just really niceRev. Kelly is just really niceRev. Kelly is just really niceRev. Kelly is just really niceRev. Kelly is just really nice
Send a message via Yahoo to Rev. Kelly

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lightkeeper
It seems to me children would be a lot better off if they were with their parents and not babysitters. Some how we should figure out ways that a child is 98% of the time with parents. Do we pay more attention to having things than we do to nurturing our children?
I don't know if it is a matter of paying attention to things. I mean, I work outside the home part time. I have to. Without what I make, no matter how little it is, we would not make it. Now, we have also worked it out that my husband works 2nd shift, and I work days, so there are only a few hours that our youngest son is not with one of us. And then he goes to my husband's parents house. So he may not be with us, but he is still with family.

I tried to do the stay at home mom thing. One, I was going stir crazy. I am just not suited to being without something outside of the home to do. And two, we were sinking into debt and bankruptcy. We needed the additional income.

I guess it just depends on where you are in your life.
__________________
"Philosophy is a walk on a slippery rock
Religion is a smile on a dog."
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 31st December 2007, 05:46 PM
metis's Avatar
Super Moderator
 

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Detroit & Marquette areas, Michigan
Posts: 2,163
Coins: 175,017.64
Bank: 0.00
Total Coins: 175,017.64
Donate
Karma:314
metis is a jewel in the roughmetis is a jewel in the roughmetis is a jewel in the roughmetis is a jewel in the rough


Judaism

Why not just have the men stay home with the kids and let the women go off to work? Wait a minute, breast feeding could be a problem. Hmmmm. Let me think this out a bit more, OK?
__________________
"The further the spiritual evolution of mankind advances, the more certain it seems to me that the path to genuine religiosity does not lie through the fear of life, and the fear of death, and blind faith, but through striving after rational knowledge."-- Einstein
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 31st December 2007, 06:31 PM
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 3,028
Coins: 14,943,885.09
Bank: 0.00
Total Coins: 14,943,885.09
Donate
Karma:296
vivamis123 is a jewel in the roughvivamis123 is a jewel in the roughvivamis123 is a jewel in the rough



Yes, Metis you have a point. That is why I asked Women or Mothers? Women should have equal rights, Job opportunities and pay. But there are somethings like having your period, being pregnant, giving Birth and breast feeding that only a women can do and which separates a women from a man.

Why should a women have to worry about bills while giving birth?

Society does not recongize a womens role/value. Society recongizes only education, what about life experience or need?

I think a single mother should get paid more for having children. I also feel that an older person with more life experience should earn more. These catagories are not even being considered in society.

Rev. Kelly, I see nothing "wrong" with you working and with your son being with a baby sitter. There is only something wrong, if you feel there is something wrong and you are stressed out.

I have something only against society not valuing a mother as a working women. With other words, if you have a fulltime job, why should you have to take on another one (not you personally)?
__________________
May your awareness be perfection
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 31st December 2007, 08:24 PM
metis's Avatar
Super Moderator
 

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Detroit & Marquette areas, Michigan
Posts: 2,163
Coins: 175,017.64
Bank: 0.00
Total Coins: 175,017.64
Donate
Karma:314
metis is a jewel in the roughmetis is a jewel in the roughmetis is a jewel in the roughmetis is a jewel in the rough


Judaism

In Sweden, after a baby is borne, the mother gets 1 full year off with pay and the father gets 2 months off although, if my memory is correct, they can switch it around.

Shalom,
Vern
__________________
"The further the spiritual evolution of mankind advances, the more certain it seems to me that the path to genuine religiosity does not lie through the fear of life, and the fear of death, and blind faith, but through striving after rational knowledge."-- Einstein
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 31st December 2007, 09:34 PM
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 3,028
Coins: 14,943,885.09
Bank: 0.00
Total Coins: 14,943,885.09
Donate
Karma:296
vivamis123 is a jewel in the roughvivamis123 is a jewel in the roughvivamis123 is a jewel in the rough



In Germany (when I lived there) parents (father or mother) got paid 3 years and were supported by the state till they were 6 years old, plus everyone gets Child support from the state till a child is 18 years old, independent of income.

I love that Germany gave the same opportunity to men as women. Most people that took the opportunity devided the time: first 1 1/2 years the mother (because of breast feeding) and then 1 1/2 the father.

I do believe strongly in parenting a child at home. To many people plan to have a baby and don't plan in the option of staying home. That is sad. Why have children if you are not going to raise them? There are many ways to make that possible, such as work from home, take in additional kids, start your own home based buisness. Also cutting down on expenses, such as cable T.V., eliminating cell phone, stop yard or pool service and stop eating out. Sometimes ones thinking has to adjust to buying clothes in thrift stores or at garage sales.

It is possible and it is so satisfing. We are building our childrens memories now. This is a time we will NEVER get back.
__________________
May your awareness be perfection
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 1st January 2008, 06:48 AM
wwwdlhow27's Avatar
seeker
 

Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Nashville
Posts: 486
Coins: 96,153.99
Bank: 130,741.71
Total Coins: 226,895.69
Donate
Karma:268
wwwdlhow27 is a jewel in the roughwwwdlhow27 is a jewel in the roughwwwdlhow27 is a jewel in the rough


It doesn't matter which of the parents stay at home, (except for the breast feeding bit) but we were all much healthier families when the economy and family units could be regulated by single income households.
__________________
Only Love Prevails,
Don
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Coins Per Thread View: 1.00
Coins Per Thread: 15.00
Coins Per Reply: 5.00




All times are GMT. The time now is 01:32 AM.


Copyright ©, 2005-2008 Interfaithforums.com. All Rights Reserved

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0