![]() |
|
Welcome to the InterfaithForums forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support. |
|
|||||||
| Religious Debate Debate religions and religious topics. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
Well my view is that scriptural laws or ordinances have a Divine origin but they were revealed for a specific time and conditions that obtained when they were revealed...
About "morality", I think this is something that has also changed over time but it is complicated when you are addressing the issue of sexuality.... The traditional view is that "sex" is encouraged say in marriage to produce offspring and have sons to inherit property and so on...and keep property in the family perhaps. Sex as lust for it's own sake as an end in itself is usually discouraged. - Art
__________________
"it benefits us to be thoughtful, not of the glory of our minds, but rather, above all else, of the glory of God." - Johannes Kepler |
|
||||
|
Well, the rules you are talking about are rules that I don't see as valid, because I don't follow a Bible based religion. I think that sex is natural and we should all enjoy it (for example). Of course we should try to be clean, but let's face it, life is messy. I think it is more important to enjoy life, and forget other people's rules. But it could be just me.
|
|
||||
|
Scriptural "laws" are no different than anything else that we try to do in an effort to protect ourselves and others.
The Mosaic law against eating pork was undoubtedly a reflection of the high potential for trichinosis at the time. This is no longer an issue, so we ignore the "law." However, when the law was written, it is not difficult to see how the notion of "unclean" animals might spread from pigs to other animals. We are human, and we look for patterns that we can draw conclusions from. So animals that were good to eat pretty routinely had cloven hooves and chewed the cud. Pigs didn't. Maybe other animals that didn't might also be dangerous. Why take the chance? These days, we publish in our newspapers and books of every kind (modern day "scripture-on-the-fly") warnings about tobacco, about the health benefits and risks of various kinds of food in large quantities. Most people pay some attention, some don't. As we become more and more frightened of the next impending flu epidemic, we are repeatedly admonished, again in our modern "scriptural" medical journals, newspapers, magazines and television, that the most effective thing that we can do is to wash our hands -- for as long as it takes to sing "Happy Birthday" twice, being sure to wash the backs as well as the fronts, using soap, removing rings, etc. Talk about prescribing ritual!!
__________________
evangelicalhumanist: Greek "eu"=good and "angelos"=messenger. Spreading the good news of Humanism. |
|
|||
|
"Scriptural "laws" are no different than anything else that we try to do in an effort to protect ourselves and others. "
------------- This is not entirely correct . There is more to "scripture" than that . It is not a "get well" book , the Bible , as so many add to it as that , but it is written by those who " knew" something but also knew they were not allowed to put it in writing as they knew the Bible , before the first word was written in it , they knew that all of Earth would be in awareness of it , this book , the Bible . And when you read it you must convert to Faith even though it is so hard to do and it must be true Faith that God can absorb and glorify you when He sees that your purity of intentions in what you think and do are in His realms. Also there are parts of the Bible that are not understandable because they incorporate things of a Miracle nature which today it seems that Man needs to see a miracle first hand to believe and some have seen the miracle in front of their awaken face and know also of the Truth and why we cannot all know this Truth , but go on Faith as our ancestors after Christ did. Last edited by mooomooo : 19th April 2007 at 06:44 PM. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
I didn't say the Bible was a "get well" book, and I didn't restrict my conception of it to only those things that affect health. It should be obvious that I intended to convey the health of the community, which is social cohesion and cooperation, among many other things. That would include, obviously, the moral codes and values which allow humans to interact without killing each other (most of the time ). And of course, you are also saying that all other books written by all other faith traditions DO NOT COUNT, or at least don't count in any of the substantive ways that you credit to the Bible. I think that is a pretty good example of exactly the kind of Christian arrogance that has led to so much horror throughout history. (I do not blame only the Christians, of course. Other religions have their share of similar arrogance). Quote:
Defend the Bible all you like, but first, read it. Every single line. Every brutal murder. Every absurdity. Find out how many men have castrated themselves because they took Matthew 19:11-12 literally. Ouch! Quote:
__________________
evangelicalhumanist: Greek "eu"=good and "angelos"=messenger. Spreading the good news of Humanism. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|