InterfaithForums

Welcome to the InterfaithForums forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support.

Arcade Support Us FAQ Calendar vBRadio Quiz
Go Back   InterfaithForums > Debate Forum > Religious Debate
Home Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Religious Debate Debate religions and religious topics.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 14th November 2007, 11:14 PM
Eolas Pellor's Avatar
Senior Member
 

Join Date: May 2007
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 916
Coins: 7,970.72
Bank: 0.05
Total Coins: 7,970.77
Donate
Karma:461
Eolas Pellor is a glorious beacon of lightEolas Pellor is a glorious beacon of lightEolas Pellor is a glorious beacon of lightEolas Pellor is a glorious beacon of lightEolas Pellor is a glorious beacon of light

Prosperity "Gospel" -- an interesting article

http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/....aspx?id=19306

Quote:
[A] new investigation of six Christian ministries by Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, is a tricky business. Grassley, the ranking member of the Senate Finance Committee, wants to know if the leaders of these ministries have misused donations to support their lavish lifestyles.

Here’s the rub: Most of the ministers targeted by Grassley — Joyce Meyer, Kenneth Copeland, Creflo Dollar, Eddie Long, Randy and Paula White — preach the so-called “prosperity Gospel,” promising financial and other worldly rewards for those who give to God’s work (i.e., their ministries)....

Of course, the government has every right to require compliance with tax laws. When these ministries signed up for tax exemption, they agreed to play by the same rules as all other charitable groups. With shekels come shackles.

Under the First Amendment, however, government doesn’t have the right to determine which version of the Gospel (or any other scripture) is authentic and which is bogus.

Grassley sent the wrong message when he told The New York Times this week: “Jesus comes into the city on a simple mule, and you got people today expanding his gospel in corporate jets. Somebody ought to raise questions about is it right or wrong.”



An interesting subject for debate, I think.

I abhor the message of the Prosperity "Gospel" types; as an outsider -- that is a non-Christain -- I think they pervert Christianity in a particularly offensive way.

But I rather agree with the author of the article, the State shouldn;t get involved in theological squabbles.

So....what is your take on this?

"Be seeing you..."
__________________
Grassaf, Eolas
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 15th November 2007, 02:23 PM
isabellalecour's Avatar
The Last Wildflower
 

Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 31
Coins: 897.02
Bank: 3,622.70
Total Coins: 4,519.72
Donate
Karma:162
isabellalecour has a spectacular aura aboutisabellalecour has a spectacular aura about
Send a message via ICQ to isabellalecour Send a message via AIM to isabellalecour Send a message via MSN to isabellalecour Send a message via Yahoo to isabellalecour
I remember the general craziness with the Baker scandal back in the '80's. It shook up alot of people but it didn't stop TV preachers and it didn't serve as a warning to the preacher who followed. There has been quite a few scandals in the last two years that didn't have as much fan fare.

But should the state get involved? Yes, they are already involved. The state determines who gets tax exempt status, rules over political speech with church and now faith based charities. But should congress be investigating a particular minister? No, it's a waste of my tax dollars when other agencies have the authority to investigate and take legal action.

Consider this, it's been a highly religious charged administration and the race for presidential elections is already underway. This Senate investigate is just a typical time wasting feel good stunt. It's really telling that an Iowa senator is spearheading it.
__________________
To breathe each breath is a prayer of thanks to Gaia.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 16th November 2007, 01:41 AM
angeleyes's Avatar
Moderator
 

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Southern US
Posts: 1,575
Coins: 176,931.95
Bank: 56,811.34
Total Coins: 233,743.29
Donate
Karma:535
angeleyes is a glorious beacon of lightangeleyes is a glorious beacon of lightangeleyes is a glorious beacon of lightangeleyes is a glorious beacon of lightangeleyes is a glorious beacon of lightangeleyes is a glorious beacon of light



Quote:
Originally Posted by Eolas Pellor
An interesting subject for debate, I think.

I abhor the message of the Prosperity "Gospel" types; as an outsider -- that is a non-Christain -- I think they pervert Christianity in a particularly offensive way.

But I rather agree with the author of the article, the State shouldn;t get involved in theological squabbles.

So....what is your take on this?

Hi Eolas - I'm not quite sure if we're talking about the money a church/program takes in, or the churches that teach abundance/prosperity. Or maybe you mean both.

I can see the issue from both sides, so I'm torn on it. I think the principle behind abundance living is a positive one (our thoughts create our reality, and while there is nothing holy about being wealthy, there is nothing holy about being poor either). That being said, the new high school that was built a couple years ago in our school district (which is very nice) is dwarfed by the Baptist church across the street. The church is 3 stories high, has 4 large wings, a running track, Starbucks, cyber cafe, etc. - It's probably as big as a major shopping mall in square footage. It still gets to me.....
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 16th November 2007, 03:08 AM
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 3,028
Coins: 14,943,808.09
Bank: 0.00
Total Coins: 14,943,808.09
Donate
Karma:296
vivamis123 is a jewel in the roughvivamis123 is a jewel in the roughvivamis123 is a jewel in the rough



Let everyone have what they desire. It's all good : )
__________________
May your awareness be perfection
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 16th November 2007, 01:13 PM
Eolas Pellor's Avatar
Senior Member
 

Join Date: May 2007
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 916
Coins: 7,970.72
Bank: 0.05
Total Coins: 7,970.77
Donate
Karma:461
Eolas Pellor is a glorious beacon of lightEolas Pellor is a glorious beacon of lightEolas Pellor is a glorious beacon of lightEolas Pellor is a glorious beacon of lightEolas Pellor is a glorious beacon of light

Good qeustion

Quote:
Originally Posted by angeleyes
Hi Eolas - I'm not quite sure if we're talking about the money a church/program takes in, or the churches that teach abundance/prosperity. Or maybe you mean both.

A good distiinction. I think he means both, since the ministers that are making a killing are the ones that seem to preach this "YHWH loves the rich man more than the poor man," "Believe and YHWH will make you wealthy," message.

I actually think that it might not be a bad idea if the authorities wanted to limit the amount any religious corporation could own/ take-in. Espeically in those cases where there is an inverse relationship between the amount raised and the amount of charity -- real charity, not building/playing for ever-larger church buildings -- engaged in.

Quote:
That being said, the new high school that was built a couple years ago in our school district (which is very nice) is dwarfed by the Baptist church across the street. The church is 3 stories high, has 4 large wings, a running track, Starbucks, cyber cafe, etc. - It's probably as big as a major shopping mall in square footage. It still gets to me.....

But high schools are for teenagers and teacher, and no one really likes teenagers or teachers, after all.

"Be seeing you..."
__________________
Grassaf, Eolas
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 16th November 2007, 06:38 PM
Junior Member
 

Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 18
Coins: 10,842.58
Bank: 0.00
Total Coins: 10,842.58
Donate
Karma:10
justifyothers is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eolas Pellor
http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/....aspx?id=19306



An interesting subject for debate, I think.

I abhor the message of the Prosperity "Gospel" types; as an outsider -- that is a non-Christain -- I think they pervert Christianity in a particularly offensive way.

But I rather agree with the author of the article, the State shouldn;t get involved in theological squabbles.

So....what is your take on this?

"Be seeing you..."

I agree that the 'prosperity gospel' is a repulsive one.
Jesus actually says not to worry about the things you need: that God already knows we NEED these things, but to seek first the kingdom of God, and these things will be added unto us. (my paraphrase Matt 6)
He was speaking about things we NEED, not wealth that we hoard, which we have taken by decieving others. (or even taking it honestly, for that matter)
When Jesus said he was here so we could have life and have it more abundantly, I take that to me the quality of life and love, NOT furs and cars and gobs of gross make up.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 17th November 2007, 06:00 AM
paleepiscopalianalien's Avatar
Miss Mary
 

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Northeastern Michigan
Posts: 28
Coins: 3,513.13
Bank: 0.00
Total Coins: 3,513.13
Donate
Karma:10
paleepiscopalianalien is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by isabellalecour

But should the state get involved? Yes, they are already involved. The state determines who gets tax exempt status, rules over political speech with church and now faith based charities. But should congress be investigating a particular minister? No, it's a waste of my tax dollars when other agencies have the authority to investigate and take legal action.

Consider this, it's been a highly religious charged administration and the race for presidential elections is already underway. This Senate investigate is just a typical time wasting feel good stunt. It's really telling that an Iowa senator is spearheading it.

Frankly, I think it's incredibly interesting that a Republican senator is leading the way in the investigation of some of the most powerful members of the religious right. I am a bleeding-heart liberal and proud of it, but I give credit where credit is due: Charles Grassley is a very courageous politician to take on the most powerful wing of his party.

These so-called prosperity preachers are despicable, bilking the poor out of their last dollar with the promise that by "sowing their seed", God will reward them with a financial windfall. A special rung of hell is reserved for these charlatans who take from the poor, old, mentally ill, and desperate among us in order to feather their own nests.

The government should do all that they legally can to protect those in our society who are least able to protect themselves. It is high time these cockroaches dressed up as holy men and women get the bright light of the law shined on them.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 17th November 2007, 06:12 AM
angeleyes's Avatar
Moderator
 

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Southern US
Posts: 1,575
Coins: 176,931.95
Bank: 56,811.34
Total Coins: 233,743.29
Donate
Karma:535
angeleyes is a glorious beacon of lightangeleyes is a glorious beacon of lightangeleyes is a glorious beacon of lightangeleyes is a glorious beacon of lightangeleyes is a glorious beacon of lightangeleyes is a glorious beacon of light



So far, we have almost all of the responses to this thread expressing a real dislike for the prosperity gospel. I'm wondering why we tend to feel that it's wrong for religious institutions to make alot of money........ Anyone know? Although I like what justifyothers said about not worrying about our needs/material desires, how many of us actually can say we follow that guidance?

Just to play the other side for a minute: Is it possible that they are practicing a very spiritual principle? That our thoughts do indeed create our experience, and that God wants us to have life abundantly? If people can go from practicing outer wealth to later including inner wealth, is it necessarly a bad thing?

Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 17th November 2007, 08:26 AM
paleepiscopalianalien's Avatar
Miss Mary
 

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Northeastern Michigan
Posts: 28
Coins: 3,513.13
Bank: 0.00
Total Coins: 3,513.13
Donate
Karma:10
paleepiscopalianalien is on a distinguished road
Properous for whom?

As we know, it is not money but the LOVE of money that is the root of all evil, so I don't think that wealth in itself is wicked. However, the subject of this thread is "Prosperity Gospel", more specifically the kind that is practiced by the six preachers subpoenaed by the Senate to hand over their financial records.

These people are televangelists who are making MILLIONS of dollars off the backs of the poor, elderly, desperate, and mentally ill. Turn on TBN and watch 5 minutes of their ""Praise-a-thon", going on right now. In a scroll at the bottom of the screen, they are directing viewers to "give $70, $700, or $7,000 as a special offering to God and he will bless you with an inheritance. 'I will be an enemy to your enemies'".

This is absolutely pornographic to me.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 17th November 2007, 09:14 AM
aged hippy's Avatar
Alchemist
 

Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wandering in a pathless land
Posts: 1,177
Coins: 169,365.04
Bank: 7,646.06
Total Coins: 177,011.10
Donate
Karma:516
aged hippy is a glorious beacon of lightaged hippy is a glorious beacon of lightaged hippy is a glorious beacon of lightaged hippy is a glorious beacon of lightaged hippy is a glorious beacon of lightaged hippy is a glorious beacon of light


I notice they use the psychologically magical number "7", -- "70", "700", "7000".... i take it 7 dollars wouldn't get his attention....?

They seem to have brought god down to their level.


Peace, Love, & Light
__________________
"An object is perceived, or not perceived, according as the mind is, or is not, tinged with the colour of the object. "
Patanjali - Sutra 4:17
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Coins Per Thread View: 1.00
Coins Per Thread: 15.00
Coins Per Reply: 5.00




All times are GMT. The time now is 05:14 AM.


Copyright ©, 2005-2008 Interfaithforums.com. All Rights Reserved

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0