![]() |
|
Welcome to the InterfaithForums forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support. |
|
|||||||
| Religious Debate Debate religions and religious topics. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
Quite frankly, the image of poverty is perhaps in the eye of the beholder.
Poverty stricken people do not consider this a conscious choice, but a circumstance of their lives. There is not much hope of a salvation from that perspective. To take a vow of poverty means that one dies to self. It means that no matter how little one has, that little, would be given to another if need be. I guess that I would say that a certain degree of poverty is needed for salvation.
__________________
Imagine all the people living life in peace,...John Lennon Last edited by martha : 24th December 2005 at 03:14 AM. |
|
||||
|
Poverty is a good way to take the "vow of simplicity" (I like to call it). And this leads to humility, which is the key to enlightenment. But necessary? No, of course not.
__________________
The only constant in this universe is change. Are you ready to change?? |
|
||||
|
Quote:
I don't believe so. To me, the real meaning of such a vow is more to prioritize things. Many people do not have their priorities right, and that is just one way of 'forcing' the issue. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
|||
|
I believe in sin as being an error, but not as it is in the concept of sin in religion. We all make errors. We do things that hurt others and ourselves. I believe that the path that our lives should take is to be conscience of these errors, and to attempt to make ourselves better people because of them, and use them to help us grow as people.
Focusing on such things as poverty or materialism hurts ourselves and hurts others who are a part of our lives. The effort should be to be the best person possible, love yourself and love others which I believe is true spirituality. |
|
||||
|
I will try to clarify a little and question a little;
Luguber, when I say the definition of sin is........, I am using the dictionary definition of sin, not necessarily my own. Taphophilia's explanation is very good. Master Vigil, if we take a vow of simplicity which leads to humility, the key to enlightenment, how does one say that it is not necessary? Is it not necessary to find this simplicity to lift ourselves and each other? Are we only here for self? When we have become enlightened and begin to relieve ourselves of the hold that this world has upon us, is that not a form of poverty? Would we not try to take a vow of this "poverty" or simplicity to achieve the saving of our own soul and the souls of others? (salvation) I await........for I have not yet achieved this state . I am still a work in progress.
__________________
Imagine all the people living life in peace,...John Lennon Last edited by martha : 30th December 2005 at 02:37 AM. |
|
||||
|
I think that the best way to put it is that one cannot serve two masters. If a person is striving to gain material wealth, they cannot at the same time strive to the utmost to gain spiritual enlightenment, no matter how important that might seem to be to them. In our society, 'money' is often strived toward like a god, and the result isn't often growth or happiness. But if a person turns inward and allows themselves to truly see themselves, good and bad, they will often find a balance and a serenity. When that happens, they begin to understand that comforts and possessions are empty, short lasting, and do nothing to fulfill a person. "Give me but a tall ship and a star to steer her by." TS Lawrence wasn't talking about this topic, but his words apply.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|