![]() |
|
Welcome to the InterfaithForums forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support. |
|
|||||||
| Religious Debate Debate religions and religious topics. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Interesting! Tell me more. I believe that the government shouldn't even recognize marriages. There shouldn't be marriage licenses or anything.
__________________
"I fully comprehended the power of the human mind at the exact moment I came to the realization that I'm totally insane and have no idea what I'm talking about."
|
|
|||
|
I agree Schizophretard. Why do I need a piece of paper to tell me with whom I want to spend my life with? I got married for tax reasons. Yes, we love eachother....but is it not enough just for us to know?
__________________
May your awareness be perfection |
|
||||
|
Marriage is a legal contract! In today's society, we have this fantasy that marriage is all about love and choosing a life partner, etc. In reality, marriage is a legal proceeding, and as such is a contract, where the limit of the contract is life.
In the past, and in many developing countries today, marriages are arranged, and done so with the idea of financial gain in mind. A man who wanted to gain property or animals would marry the farmer's daughter. A man who wanted political power would marry the mayor's daughter, if the price could be afforded. Women were property and bought and sold as such. Love was not part of the equation. Granted most marriage contracts included fidelity clauses, so the couple must be true to each other, but affairs abounded during this time. If you were caught, the price was high; including banning from the community, which was needed for survival, or in some areas, death especially if you were a woman. In today's society, most marriages are made based on love and commitment, not financial or political gain. But there are still financial gains that marriage gives a person: additional insurance coverage, retirement benefits, tax relief, and so on and so forth. For those reasons, marriage is still the legal contract it once was. Now, don't get me wrong. I love Kathy's essay on marriage and agree with its contents. But to get the full view of what marriage is and where the idea comes from....well, reading about the history helps.
__________________
"Philosophy is a walk on a slippery rock Religion is a smile on a dog." |
|
|||
|
I got married to my second wife because we love each other
Should she decide to leave at any point I will wish only happiness for her Should she want everything we own, it is hers Because I love her You cant sign up to that or bring it about with a contract or via the fear of condemnation - Its in the heart and comes from realising that Love is given with no strings |
|
||||
|
Quote:
The problem is that marriage is not about love on a historic or legal sense, it is about power and money. Let's face it, when the state recognizes a marriage, it makes money....probably the best argument for the state to monitor it.
__________________
"Philosophy is a walk on a slippery rock Religion is a smile on a dog." |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|