![]() |
|
Welcome to the InterfaithForums forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support. |
|
|||||||
| Religious Debate Debate religions and religious topics. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
This is an excerpt from an artilce I saw today. What do you think?
By M.J. STEPHEY Tue Sep 23, 6:40 PM ET A fellow at New York City's Weill Cornell Medical Center, Dr. Sam Parnia is one of the world's leading experts on the scientific study of death. Last week Parnia and his colleagues at the Human Consciousness Project announced their first major undertaking: a 3-year exploration of the biology behind "out-of-body" experiences. The study, known as AWARE (AWAreness during REsuscitation), involves the collaboration of 25 major medical centers through Europe, Canada and the U.S. and will examine some 1,500 survivors of cardiac arrest. TIME spoke with Parnia about the project's origins, its skeptics and the difference between the mind and the brain. What sort of methods will this project use to try and verify people's claims of "near-death" experience? When your heart stops beating, there is no blood getting to your brain. And so what happens is that within about 10 sec., brain activity ceases - as you would imagine. Yet paradoxically, 10% or 20% of people who are then brought back to life from that period, which may be a few minutes or over an hour, will report having consciousness. So the key thing here is, Are these real, or is it some sort of illusion? So the only way to tell is to have pictures only visible from the ceiling and nowhere else, because they claim they can see everything from the ceiling. So if we then get a series of 200 or 300 people who all were clinically dead, and yet they're able to come back and tell us what we were doing and were able see those pictures, that confirms consciousness really was continuing even though the brain wasn't functioning.
__________________
RevKathyV http://www.myspace.com/divinelightinterfaith www.divinelightinterfaithministry.com |
|
||||
|
Quote:
The important question is this; were they brought back to life (i.e. from real death) or merely recovered from an altered state of consciousness? Is it more like waking up from a drug overdose? Quote:
I view it as a complex illusion or hallucination that is brain based because I too have interviewed a smaller sample of 43 patients who described their Near Death Experiences and an uncounted hundreds of epileptic patients who have had Complex Partial Seizures in our Epilepsy Unit. They had all of the components but were never in danger of death. Those who had arrested or came out of transient hypotensive shock, about a fourth had OBE's of viewing the room from the ceiling (many others were standing beside their body.) What I found (and one was my mother) that they described the rooms in detail. The problem was that they made many mistakes. Mum knew all of the doctors and nurses by name. However she named two doctors in the code team incorrectly (they were not on duty at that time), and she identified me among the group (I was not there but outside the room.) Mum also described the defibrillation procedure. She said one electrode paddle was placed on her right shoulder and the other on her left hip. "Mi bloody **** 'ip still burrrns whin I tooch it." My conclusion is that the OBE visual phenomena are fascinating and convincing when first heard. However, a few more questions in cross-examination show errors. Quote:
The problem is the term clinically dead. Many non-medical folks consider cardiac arrest to be clinical death. It is not...unless brain hypoxaemia proceeds far enough to kill all of the neurons. Clinical Death is dead neurons. Awaking from clinical death is a misdiagnosis of clinical death. Even when a code is "called" and the patient pronounced dead, they may not yet be dead. They obviously will die in seconds or minutes if the heart is not pumping. Clinical Death requires: 1. Loss of pupillary reflexes, 2. Loss of reflexive eye movements (Doll's eyes and caloric responses,) 3. Loss of corneal responses, 4. Absence of any spontaneous breathing trigger with measured hypoxia/hypercarbia, 5. Loss of patterned motor responses (flaccid paralysis). In various series of over 500 cases, none of those who met the five criteria never awoke. Cardiac asystole is not strictly brain death or real death. If reversed in quick order, the person awakes and never did die. That is why the term NEAR Death Experience is more correct. Those cardiac arrest patients who awoke never died. Death is not reversible. We already know that similarly episodes can occur in people who are not near death, such as Complex Partial Seizures, or Newberg's series of meditating Buddhist monks or praying Nuns who had similar and often identical components of the experiences. They can also be produced by drugs that lower the seizure threshold (and there are many used for psychosis, nausea, asthma, bronchitis, antibiotics, and alcohol/drug withdrawal.) I have a personal involvement in this because I am on a team that makes brain death (true death) determinations for the organ donation surgeons. Since time is of the essence, I quickly determine the clinical criteria. If possible, I do a quick fMRI that is absolute confirmation of a dead brain (no metabolism in cells.) We now have an even quicker method using magnetic brain stimulator over the convexity of the head with pick up electrodes in muscles. There is a known latency (time) for brain impulses to reach muscle synapses.) This is extremely reliable and quick to do if you have the set-up ready. I do not have to wait for printed images. I can read the latency off the computer. If there is no response after repeated stimuli at increasing power, that confirms dead brain cortex. One can quickly counter-test that with reversed somatosensory latencies. The Tibial nerve is stimulated while the receptor is over the sensory brain cortex (Post-Central gyrus). When that produces no response, we sadly tell the transplant surgeons. It is important not to misuse our results to disprove the existence of a soul. It just shows that the OBE's and NDE's are NOT evidence for the soul. We visit the dead loved ones in dreams also, but that does not prove or disprove the soul. Is that fair enough? We sometimes sample the brain at either post-mortem exam or biopsy, so that we can determine unquestionable brain death (neuronal death apoptosis.) Then the Neuropathologist can determine the approximate hours or minutes since death occurred by the degree of change from cell swelling to rupture, nuclear breakdown, and spilled neurofibrils. If desired we can also measure the spinal fluid levels of Potassium which rises in concentration at a consistent rate following death. This is why I use the gospels to show that even if they are true, it does not prove that Jesus really died on the cross, and therefore his resurrection may have simply been awakening from hypotensive (shock) coma that stopped short of brain death by being placed in the supine position immediately. Aye, I am one of those pesky sceptics (or skeptics in Americanese) Amergin
__________________
Militant Agnostic: I don't know, and neither do you. There is no evidence of God so belief is optional. |
|
||||
|
Kathy,
You might have some sort virus that replicates on your first citation in your post... MAybe be careful about that.. It replicates screens like crazy..had to shut my computer down and restart it. Anyway yeh.. Out of Body experiences are interesting and should be documented if at all possible.. I think there may well be something to it. The brain could be more a tool of consciousness rather than the other way around perhaps. - Art
__________________
"it benefits us to be thoughtful, not of the glory of our minds, but rather, above all else, of the glory of God." - Johannes Kepler |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Art, the brain is the seat of consciousness. Consciousness is a major brain function among many brain functions. There is strong evidence for that. Drugs can alter consciousness from confusion, to somnolence, to coma. Blunt head trauma with concussion of Frontal, temporal, and deep brain structures causes unconscious. Diseases such as brain tumours can alter consciousness, change basic personality, alter language, alter reasoning, altering emotion, and with increased intracranial pressure cause physiological changes that lead to unconsciousness and/or death. Encephalitis can cause mental chages and coma or death. Deep General Anaesthesia causes a complete unconsciousness. I had surgery on a chest injury, surgery was over three hours. I remember the anaesthetist telling me to count back from 10. I reached 6 or 5 then suddenly felt a cricket bat down my throat. I struggled but could not say, "Don't start yet, I am not under yet." The nurse told me to relax, ******, the surgery went very well, and you are in recovery. Those 3 hours never happened in my mind. There was less than a second between counting 5 and awaking with a trachael tube into my lungs. If there is a hypothetical entity called the Soul which merely works the brain, where was it during those 3 hours. Are you saying the soul is altered by chemicals? If so then it is not spirit but matter. I have heard the same from those who underwent anaesthesis (full anaesthesia). If the anaesthesiologist is sloppy or inattentive and lightens up on the drug admiistration, the person may awaken or partially awaken. That happens occasionally. In Deep General Anaesthesia, the brain is electrically flat lined temporarily. The Neurons are totally shut down. There are no electrical transmissions. fMRI on them shows no active metabolic uptake as seen in a working neuron. No neuronal activity means no electrical transmissions, no fluctuations in transmembrane neuronal voltage gradient. It is as close to brain death we can get, but it is not permanent but only drug suppressed. Where is the soul? Does the soul leave the body during surgery and anaesthesis as Stone Age men thought when we dreamed? I can't disprove the soul. Every observation of consciousness, in trauma, disease, ischaemia, hypoxia, seizures, tumours, strokes, etc, all show that conscious is brain based. The Mind is a product of Brain circuit transmissions and altered if those neurons and axons are altered in some way. Mind is a product of the Brain as is reason, emotion, religious belief, scepticism, anger, love, hate, walking, hand grasp, perception of senses, swallowing, eating, drinking, pooping, and peeing. Everything suggest that the most plausible explanation of mind (soul) is that it dies when the brain dies. Amergin.
__________________
Militant Agnostic: I don't know, and neither do you. There is no evidence of God so belief is optional. |
|
||||
|
Thanks for your post..
My consciousness has been around awhile as near as I can tell about ohh sixty eight years maybe so it's more apart of me I guess than some cells.. but you're free to draw your own conclusions, also, if I ever need a course in brain functioning I'll certainly keep you in mind er ah brain! - Art ![]()
__________________
"it benefits us to be thoughtful, not of the glory of our minds, but rather, above all else, of the glory of God." - Johannes Kepler Last edited by arthra : 26th September 2008 at 12:59 AM. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
That is a conviincing piece of evidence. Your consciousness has been around for 68 years yet you are age 38. What do you remember about your first 30 years of consciousness? My problem is that I am 65 but my consciousness has been around for only 62 of those years. My earliest clear memory is at age when Mum took me to Dundee on the train. I only remember getting off the train at the terminal in a crowd of people. It was very scary. I recall minor trivial details but scared because people were all talking in a gutteral foreign language, English. At that time my only words were Gaelic. So my first fright when I became conscious was the scary English language. Today, I still have an unusual feeling of comfort and safety when I am in a Gaelic speaking town in a restaurant where I don't hear English. Could it be that English causes stress? Amergin
__________________
Militant Agnostic: I don't know, and neither do you. There is no evidence of God so belief is optional. |
|
||||
|
Amergin:
That is a conviincing piece of evidence. Your consciousness has been around for 68 years yet you are age 38. What do you remember about your first 30 years of consciousness? My problem is that I am 65 but my consciousness has been around for only 62 of those years. I still outrank you then by a few years! Nope I'm not age 38?! What do I remember about my first 30 years of consciousness? Uh well I recall being in a crib and eaten by mosquitos as a toddler and trying to plug in some Christmas tree lights into each other that caused a flash. Going for walks at night with my Springer Spaniel ...Crawling out the bedroom window when my Grandfather baby sat and riding home in a patrol car eating chokolate cookies. Consciousness likely I believe is in the womb and some psychologists claim the birth trauma is an important event.. Check it out: Pre- and perinatal psychology - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Is there life after birth? I think so. - Art ![]()
__________________
"it benefits us to be thoughtful, not of the glory of our minds, but rather, above all else, of the glory of God." - Johannes Kepler |
|
|||
|
Amergin,
I vaguely remember reading about astronaughts in their training reporting classic near-death experiences when they pass out on a centrifuge machine. (That's the machine that twirls them in a circle subjecting them to increased centrifigal force.) They reported going down a tunnel toward a light, seeing beings on the way and so on. Are you aware of this? What do you think? |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|